The British are infatuated with owning their own property and
politicians know that. Margaret Thatcher used it as a vote winner in 1979 when
she allowed council house tenants to buy their own home. Coming to the present
day, Boris Johnson’s Conservative government have anxieties that the Brits have
not been buying nearly enough homes lately and, as with all countries in the
world, the British property market was put ‘on ice’ for several months to help contain the
Coronavirus, exacerbating the problem.
The
Chancellor, Rishi Sunak, announced plans to boost the property market by momentarily
scrapping Stamp Duty Tax (a tax paid by homebuyers) when they buy a property
that costs less than £500,000.
Interestingly,
Stamp Duty was originally introduced in 1694 as a way to raise funds for
The Nine Years' War (1688–1697) against Louis XIV of France and
applied to property and some legal documents.
Why is
this important? Well the Government recognise that when the property market is
working well, the economy also tends to work well, yet one of the barriers to
people moving home is Stamp Duty. Even before Coronavirus, Brits were moving
40.21% less than they were at the start of the millennium, and now with this
dreadful situation, the natural reaction is for people to stay put in their own
homes, meaning another potential nail in the coffin for the economy.
Stamp Duty
has raised not an insignificant £166.53bn since 1998, impressive when you
consider the NHS costs £129bn per annum. Looking at more recent figures, the
Government currently raise £1.045bn per month from Stamp Duty Tax and this statement
will remove a good chunk of that from the Chancellors coffers each month, yet
the Government knows a healthy property market will help the wider economy.
As Stamp
Duty is a transaction tax, it restricts labour market mobility, making people who
are thinking of switching jobs think twice before moving. Stamp Duty also holds
back elderly homeowners from downsizing to smaller homes, which is an issue for
the UK, as we don’t have enough homes to meet supply and also curtails first
time buyers as it forces them to use some of the savings on the tax, as opposed
to using for a deposit.
Before the
changes, the Stamp Duty thresholds were as follows:
-
Zero percent up to £125,000
-
Two percent of the next £125,000 (the portion
from £125,001 to £250,000)
-
Five percent of the next £675,000 (the portion
from £250,001 to £925,000)
-
Ten percent of the next £575,000 (the portion
from £925,001 to £1.5 million)
-
12% of the remaining amount (the portion above
£1.5 million)
and between
the 8th July 2020 and 31st March 2021
-
Zero percent up to £500,000
-
Five percent of the next £425,000 (the portion
from £500,001 to £925,000)
-
Ten percent of the next £575,000 (the portion
from £925,001 to £1.5 million)
-
12% of the remaining amount (the portion above
£1.5 million)
Landlords
and buy to let landlords will also benefit from these reduced rates yet will
still have to pay their additional premium for second homes (as they have since
April 2016).
To give
you an idea how significant this is, if these rules had been in place exactly a
year ago for Huddersfield properties purchased under £500,000 (i.e. between
the 8th July 2019 and 31st March 2020).
Stamp Duty would not have been paid on
1,218
Huddersfield properties, worth in total
£263,635,700
Anyone buying any home in Huddersfield over £500,000 are also
winners in this, as they will save having to pay the first £15,000 in stamp
duty (under the old scheme). This is because during these 9 months, stamp duty
is only paid on the difference over £500,000 (so if you buy a property for
say £620,000 – one only pays the stamp duty on the difference between £620,000
and £500,000 i.e. £120,000).
I’m all for reducing Stamp Duty, which is imposed
progressively at higher rates the higher a property costs (as you can see
from the tables above). Yet, short-lived changes to property taxation
risk warping the property market and generating a ‘property market hangover’
in Spring 2021. I am part of a group of 2,500 estate and letting agents from
the UK, and most of us were running at 150% speed before
this announcement, coping with the post Coronavirus explosion in demand.
Now it seems that the ‘feast’ will
continue until the end of March 2021 as many more people will move to take advantage
of the cut in tax. However, some are suggesting this could lead to ‘famine’
down the line as it will stop people moving into the late spring and summer of
2021.
History
tells us different stories on the influence on transaction volumes from changing
Stamp Duty rates. In 1991 the Tory’s raised the Stamp Duty threshold at which house buyers started paying and
Gordon Brown did so in 2008 when we went into the Credit Crunch. More
recently, both George Osborne and Philip Hammond fine-tuned Stamp Duty so that landlords
had to pay an additional Stamp Duty Premium after March 2016 whilst first-time
buyers pay less Stamp Duty and the purchasers of more expensive homes (over
£1.5m) pay more.
The Stamp Duty
changes for landlords in 2016 affected the property market only for a short
while and by the autumn, transactions levels had returned to normal. However, in
1991, John Major’s Stamp Duty change encouraged home buyers to bring forward home purchases but
nevertheless the property market ground to a standstill again once the benefit ended
(although the steps up the 1990’s Stamp Duty levels were much harsher as the
tax applied to the whole purchase price, not the margin steps as it had in the
1990’s).
So how much money will Huddersfield
people save when buying a home under £500k?
The average Stamp Duty paid by those Huddersfield home
buyers in the 9 months between the 8th July 2019 and 31st
March 2020
was £1,829
Being objective,
I can see why the Chancellor could see this as a suitable way to motivate
spending because when people move home, they are more inclined to spend comprehensively
on property renovations and the services of solicitors, home removal people, tradesmen
and estate agents. So, drastically reducing Stamp Duty will undoubtedly help
the UK economy, or at least contain some of the damage from the Coronavirus.
Also, the
experience of being in lockdown will have confirmed to many Huddersfield people
that they need a bigger home or one with a bigger garden. I also suspect other
people may be able to work from home on a more long-lasting basis, meaning there
could be a shift from the larger cities to outlying towns and even a move to
the countryside.
So, these
are my thoughts, what are yours?
No comments:
Post a Comment