Last week the Bank of England increased interest rates to 2.25% and they are expected to be 3.25% by early next year. This increase will make the monthly mortgage payments more expensive for first-time buyers, an issue dubbed by some as the 'property affordability crunch.'
It will also damage the household budgets of homeowners
coming off their fixed-rate mortgages in the next 12 months.
So how many homeowners are coming off their fixed rates in
the next year?
Of the 7.97 million homeowners with a mortgage in the UK,
6.1 million of them are on a fixed-rate mortgage at an average rate of 2.04%. Industry
statistics show around 1.3 million homeowners are coming off their fixed rate
in the next 12 months.
The current crop of fixed-rate mortgage deals available
today have already had the recent increase in the base rate ‘priced-in’ for
weeks.
The cheapest 5-year fixed rate today for a 65% Loan to Value
re-mortgage (i.e. you are borrowing 65% of the value of your home) is a
mortgage rate of 3.8% with Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS).
So, what will be the difference in mortgage payments
between a 2.04% mortgage and a 3.8% mortgage?
Say an average Huddersfield first-time buyer bought their
first home in November 2019 on a 25-year mortgage. They had a 3-year fixed-rate
mortgage, and let's assume they fixed it at 2.04% (as mentioned above), meaning
their fixed-rate deal finishes next month. They have £260,000 outstanding on their
mortgage, and their Huddersfield house is worth £400,000. They would have been
paying £1,107 per month for the last three years (assuming they took out a
25-year repayment mortgage).
On the RBS deal above, they will have to start paying £1,548
per month from November when they come off their initial rate – a rise of £441
per month in mortgage payments. That’s quite a rise and potential blow to their
household budgets.
Yet if they pushed back the repayment term from 22 years to,
say, 35 years, that reduces the payment to £1,120 per month – something to
consider if you are re-mortgaging in the coming 12 months.
What will the stamp duty changes mean for
Huddersfield property owners?
PM Liz Truss and Chancellor
Kwasi Kwarteng believe that cutting stamp duty will support economic growth by encouraging
more people to move home or jump onto the property ladder.
Stamp duty also has
other harmful side effects as it decreases labour market elasticity and
curtails people from selling up and buying elsewhere, where the jobs are.
Also, stamp duty makes
mature homeowners stay put in their large homes rather than downsizing. This
reduction in stamp duty will encourage those mature homeowners to move, thus freeing
up their large family homes for the younger families that need them.
The Chancellor doubled the zero-rate stamp duty band from
£125,000 to £250,000, passing a stamp duty tax saving of up
to £2,500 for all English homebuyers.
Also,
tax savings are even more significant for first-time buyers, particularly in
areas with high house prices, such as London and the South East. They can save
a maximum of £11,250 in stamp duty – with a new zero-rate band of £425,000,
based on a higher £625,000 spend cap (i.e. the house they buy can't be over
£625,000 for them to qualify for the tax relief).
So,
what effect will these stamp duty changes have on the Huddersfield property
market? Looking at recent events in the local property market is the best place
to start.
Of the 3,155 transactions in the Huddersfield area since June 2021,
2,360 were below £250,000. These would now be tax-free!
Unsurprisingly, most housing transactions in Huddersfield were below the
£250,000 threshold, yet irrespective of that point, it’s a saving of up to
£2,500 for all future Huddersfield homebuyers.
Anyone currently buying a house in Huddersfield and not yet completed on
their purchase (completion is when you have paid the money for your home and
collected the keys) will be in line to make this saving.
Huddersfield landlords purchasing buy-to-let properties will also save
money with the stamp duty cut (but they will still be liable for their
second home stamp duty levy of 3%).
Overall, this is a welcome move to help the Huddersfield property
market.
Yet will
the stamp duty threshold rise have the seismic effect that the Rishi Sunak stamp
duty holiday did in 2021, where just under 40% more people moved home than the
long-term 30-year average?
I am sure the stamp duty cut will somewhat offset the
cost of rising mortgage rates mentioned in this article and cushion the blow to
the property market.
A blow to what you might ask?
Well, many people judge the property market's health
by house prices.
The average value of a Huddersfield property stands at £215,894
and has risen 34.2% in the last five years. Not bad, eh?
But
I believe there is a better way to judge the health of the local property
market, and that is the number of people moving home (i.e. housing
transactions).
You
might be asking yourself why we should be more concerned about the number of
property transactions and not the change in property values.
Many
economists believe the number of property transactions is a far more accurate
bellwether for the health and potency of the local housing market. A greater
number of people moving home is better for the whole economy (i.e. what these
changes are being made for) than a smaller number of transactions, whilst the
same can’t be said for higher house prices.
So
what is going to happen to Huddersfield house prices?
I believe the growth in Huddersfield house prices achieved in
2021/22 is not sustainable into 2023.
In conjunction with the price cap on energy bills,
the stamp duty change, the reversal of the rise in National Insurance and the
drop in Income Tax will mitigate house price drops. Yet, I foresee a ‘slight’
realignment in the house prices being achieved in 2023, compared to 2022.
The more significant impact these changes will have
is the number of people moving home in the next 12 months.
I have been forecasting a 15% to 20% year-on-year drop
in Huddersfield property transactions in 2023. Following this stamp duty cut
and the measures mentioned above, I believe it will be lower, yet around 5%
lower.
To conclude, I predict we will have slightly lower house prices
and fewer people moving home in Huddersfield, but not any way a crash that many
thought was on the horizon.
Before I go though, let me share some
thoughts on whether stamp duty is a fair tax.
Now, this is almost
a topic for a standalone article itself. Some economists believe that removing stamp
duty (which raised £14.1bn in tax in 2021) and replacing that lost income to
the Exchequer by increasing council tax on more expensive properties would do a
lot more than other intended tax cuts to boost economic growth.
According to some
commentators, the way UK Government taxes housing is flawed. They suggest instead
of taxing an infrequent property transaction particularly harshly (the average stamp
duty bill is £10,600), the Government should tax living in a house more,
especially those who live in the higher priced properties.
So let us see how
viable that could be …
Even if council tax
was frozen for bands A to D (the lower priced properties), and the uplift
between the more expensive council tax bands was doubled on each step between band
D and H (so a typical band E property owner would see their council tax rise
from £2,473 to £3,628 per year and a typical band H see a rise of from £3,435
per year to £5,790 per year), such massive increases in council tax would be
political suicide for the wealthy Tory voting homeowners and only raise £5.28bn
– a long way from the £14.1bn currently raised.
Now, if the £14.1bn
tax raise were spread evenly over all council tax bands, the average band D
property would need to rise by £490 per year, and even a band A would increase
by an extra £382 a year … something that again would be political suicide.
Yes, stamp duty is
flawed. It's just every other option has more significant flaws.
Anyway, these are
just my thoughts. Tell me, people of Huddersfield, what are your thoughts on
the Budget, the stamp duty changes or whether stamp duty is fit for purpose and
what you would do if you were the Chancellor to bolster the British property
market?
No comments:
Post a Comment